What Should Food Manufacturers Do First to Transition to MS 1480:2025?
With the introduction of MS 1480:2025, many food manufacturers are unsure where to begin.
A rushed or unstructured transition often leads to audit findings, nonconformities, and rework.
The key to a smooth transition is knowing what to do first—and what to prioritize.
Why MS 1480:2025 Transition Requires a Structured Approach
MS 1480:2025 is not a minor update.
It emphasizes:
-
Stronger risk-based thinking
-
Clear hazard justification
-
Effective system implementation
-
Ongoing verification and review
Transitioning successfully requires system review—not document replacement.
First Things Food Manufacturers Should Do to Transition to MS 1480:2025
1️⃣ Conduct a HACCP Gap Analysis Against MS 1480:2025
This should always be the first step.
Key focus areas:
-
Hazard analysis completeness
-
CCP determination logic
-
PRP effectiveness
-
Verification and validation activities
-
HACCP team competency
A proper gap analysis:
-
Identifies non-compliant areas early
-
Prevents unnecessary documentation changes
-
Sets clear transition priorities
2️⃣ Review and Update the HACCP Hazard Analysis
Common gaps found include:
-
Outdated process flow diagrams
-
Generic hazard identification
-
Missing justification for hazard significance
Under MS 1480:2025, manufacturers must:
-
Link hazards directly to each process step
-
Justify why hazards are significant or not
-
Consider real operational conditions
3️⃣ Reassess CCP Determination and Control Measures
Many existing HACCP plans:
-
Overuse CCPs
-
Lack technical justification
-
Use historical decisions without review
MS 1480:2025 requires:
-
Clear logic for CCP decisions
-
Evidence-based critical limits
-
Defined actions when controls fail
4️⃣ Strengthen Prerequisite Programs (PRPs)
PRPs are a major audit focus under the new standard.
Food manufacturers should review:
-
Cleaning and sanitation effectiveness
-
Pest control monitoring and trend analysis
-
Maintenance and calibration programs
-
Personal hygiene and GMP controls
Weak PRPs often:
-
Lead to HACCP failures
-
Trigger major nonconformities
5️⃣ Verify and Validate Food Safety Controls
Many companies confuse these two activities.
MS 1480:2025 emphasizes:
-
Validation: proving controls work before use
-
Verification: confirming controls work continuously
Manufacturers should:
-
Validate CCPs and OPRPs
-
Review monitoring data trends
-
Conduct internal verification activities regularly
6️⃣ Review Change Management Procedures
Transitioning requires evaluating:
-
New raw materials
-
Supplier changes
-
Process or equipment modifications
-
Production volume changes
MS 1480:2025 expects:
-
HACCP review triggered by change
-
Documented decision-making
-
Updated hazard analysis where needed
7️⃣ Train and Re-Engage the HACCP Team
A major transition failure occurs when:
-
HACCP knowledge stays with one person
-
Team members cannot explain decisions
-
Training is outdated
The updated standard expects:
-
Competent HACCP team members
-
Understanding of risk-based decisions
-
Active participation in system maintenance
What Food Manufacturers Should NOT Do First
❌ Rewrite all documents without gap analysis
❌ Copy templates claiming “MS 1480:2025 compliant”
❌ Wait until the next audit to act
❌ Focus only on paperwork, not implementation
How Long Should the MS 1480:2025 Transition Take?
Transition timelines depend on:
-
HACCP system maturity
-
PRP effectiveness
-
Staff competency
Typically:
-
Simple operations: 2–3 months
-
Complex operations: 3–6 months
Early preparation reduces:
-
Audit pressure
-
Corrective action costs
-
Business disruption
MS 1480:2025 and ISO 22000: Why Alignment Matters
MS 1480:2025 aligns closely with:
-
ISO 22000 risk-based thinking
-
System effectiveness requirements
-
Continuous improvement principles
For manufacturers planning ISO 22000:
-
MS 1480:2025 transition is a critical foundation
-
Weak HACCP systems often lead to ISO audit failure
Final Thought
The first step in transitioning to MS 1480:2025 is not updating documents—it is understanding where your current system truly stands.
Food manufacturers that:
-
Start with a proper gap analysis
-
Focus on real implementation
-
Engage their HACCP team
will experience a smoother, faster, and more successful transition.
Need guidance from an experienced HACCP Consultant in Malaysia?
If your HACCP system feels heavy, audit-driven, or difficult to sustain in daily operations, it may be time to reset the approach and build a practical food safety system—one that helps you control hazards effectively, reduce non-conformities, and support consistent production practices.
For more information:
HACCP – Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Point System
For more information or an initial discussion, please contact:
https://wa.me/60162681036
Jan 09,2026